In daily life, the individual actor mixes one look with another, one interaction style or emotional ideal with another Half-wittingly, she blends parts of the two codes, or alternates between them depending on the situation at hand. Advice books do the same thing, occasionally adding other cultural elements as well. For example, Marabel Morgan’s The Total Woman draws from a traditional code, as it was known to mainly white middle-class urban women of the late nineteenth century. In both books, wives are advised to defer to the husband’s authority with good grace, and to cultivate a separate domestic presence as the “sunshine of one’s home.” At the same time, writing in 1973, as a right-wing Christian answer to the sexual revolution of the 1960s, Morgan drew simultaneously on the Bible and Playboy and gained notoriety for advising women to greet their husbands at the front door in a series of costumes. She says:
I have heard women complain, “My husband isn’t satisfied with just me. He wants lots of women. What can 1 do?” You can be lots of different women to him. Costumes provide variety without him ever leaving home. I believe that every man needs excitement and high adventure at home. Never let him know what to expect when he opens the front door, make it a surprise package. You may be a smoldering sexpot or an All American fresh beauty. Be a pixie or a pirate, a cowgirl or a show girl. Keep him offguard.’
chart і Gender Codes
Traditional (Hierarch |
Modem (One form oj Egalitarian) |
|
Look |
highly gender dif ferentiated |
less gender differentiated |
Female dress |
pastel colors |
subdued “male” colors |
small patterns |
bold patterns |
|
smooth materials, silk |
rough materials |
|
lace, Riffles, frills |
no frills |
|
sweet-sixteen look: informal |
career-woman look: business |
|
dress or slacks for house and |
suits for work, “upper-class |
|
shopping, "ladylike" look for parties |
ladylike” look for parties |
|
high-heeled shoes |
low heels |
|
long Fingernails |
short, plain nails |
|
long hair |
short hair |
|
Interactional stvle |
dissimulation, wiles, "get- |
direct dealing, no wiles, (wiles |
ting around men” through |
considered beneath modern |
|
indirect means, crying, playing on male sympathy |
woman, “sneaky”) |
|
Face |
deferential to men, bashful, |
direct look, no blushing, open |
blush easily, downward glance |
“assertive expression” |
|
face used as instrument for |
masked and open emotional |
|
emotional expression, uses “eyes” |
expression |
|
Body |
take up as little room as |
assume full size, erect posture, |
possible, leaning posture, bashful knee-bend, head tilt |
weight on both legs |
|
Hand |
"fish” handshake, modified version of presenting hand for ritual kiss |
direct, businesslike grasp |
Speech |
hospitable to interruption, |
discourages interruption, |
use of “female” vocabulary, e. g., “lovely” |
male vocabulary |
|
Feeling rules |
gender asymmetry in love, |
gender symmetry in love; both |
put love of man first; cultivate love, subordinate ambition |
sexes rank love in same way |
|
suppress anger, or deal with it indirectly |
not good to be “clinging vine" |
|
don’t be “too” aggressive, |
don’t be “too” passive, |
|
active, or independent |
dependent |
|
Emotion |
suppress initiative, try to fit |
suppress passivity, try to be |
management |
“code" personality |
assertive |
In harnessing the notion of sexual variety from the 1960s to monogamous Ch vistian marriage, Morgan ironically concedes more cultural territory than she intends. By fighting fire with fire, she accepts the otherwise inhospitable ideal of sexual variety into the Christian home, creating with it a new job and series of looks for the Christian wife. She thus adds to the idea of being the “sunshine of one’s home” the further idea of being playful, entertaining, sexy. It’s now a woman’s job to make monogamy fun.
In turn, important aspects of Morgan’s mix appear in Helen Gurley Brown’s 1982 Having It AU. Brown reduces the range of contexts in which Morgan’s rules of female deference to males apply and expands the range of contexts in which egalitarian ones do. She advises women on the match of context to code. For example, in Having It AU, a woman should be flattering, wily, and submissive with her new love or husband, but assertive and unafraid to be defeminized at work. Just as Morgan created a hybrid code out of the Bible and Hollywood, so Brown made a hybrid out of Morgan and Wall Street.