Prenatal Development: X and Y Make the Difference
Sexual Differentiation in the Womb Atypical Sexual Differentiation: Not Always Just X and Y Gender Roles and Gender Traits Girls Act Like Girls, Boys Act Like Boys Are Gender Roles Innate?
Studying Gender
Gender Role Theory
Evolutionary Theory: Adapting to Our Environment Social Learning Theory: Learning From Our Environment Cognitive Development Theory: Age-State Learning Gender Schema Theory: Our Cultural Maps Gender Hierarchy Theories: Power and Subordination Varieties of Gender Masculinity: The Hunter Femininity: The Nurturer Androgyny: Feminine and Masculine Transgenderism: Living as the Other Sex
Transsexualism: When Gender and Biology Don’t Agree Third Genders: Other Cultures, Other Options Asexualism: The Genetics, But Not the Sex
■ PERSONAL VOICES Toby: An Asexual Person
Gender Role Socialization From Infancy
Through Old Age
Childhood: Learning by Playing
■ SEX IN REAL LIFE Play Like a Boy! Play Like a Girl! Adolescence: Practice Being Female or Male Adulthood: Careers and Families
The Senior Years
Different, But Not Less Than:
Toward Gender Equality
Chapter Review
Chapter Resources
Sexuality У Now Go to www. thomsonedu. com to link to SexualityNow, your online study tool.
When a baby is born, new parents are eager to hear whether “It’s a Girl” or “It’s a Boy,” but what if it were neither? What if a newborn child had ambiguous genitalia and it was impossible to tell whether it was a boy or a girl? A child with the gonads (testes or ovaries) of one gender but with ambiguous external genitalia is often referred to as intersexed. Intersexed girls and boys are often reared as members of their chromosomal sex. Throughout history most parents have opted for immediate surgery to quickly assign the child’s gender to either male or female (Neergaard, 2005). But isn’t gender more than anatomy or hormones? What is gender? Gender raises many issues. For example, does your university allow you to have a roommate who is the other gender? Over the last couple of years, many universities across the country have established “gender neutral” housing (Marklein, 2004), which means it doesn’t matter what gender you are when it comes to living quarters on campus. These efforts are part of a national movement aimed at helping students who may feel confused or who have questions about their gender. Before we go any further, let’s talk about how people tend to use the words sex and gender synonymously, even though they have different meanings. When you fill out a questionnaire that asks you “What is your sex?” how do you answer? When you apply for a driver’s license and they ask, “What gender are you?” how do you respond? Although your answers here might be the same, researchers usually use the word sex to refer to the biological aspects of being male or female and gender to refer to the behavioral, psychological, and social characteristics of men and women (Pryzgoda & Chrisler, 2000). You might wonder why exploring gender is important to our understanding of sexuality. How does gender affect sexuality? Gender stereotypes shape our opinions about how men and women act sexually. For example, if we believe that men are more aggressive than women, we might believe that these gender stereotypes carry over in the bedroom as well. Traditionally, men are viewed as the initiators in sexual activity, and they are the ones who are supposed to make all the “moves.” Stereotypes about women, on the other hand, hold that women are more emotional and connected when it comes to sex—more into “making love” than “having sex.” Do gender stereotypes really affect how we act and interact sexually? We will explore the relationship between gender and sexuality later in this chapter. So, let’s ask again, what is a man? A woman? Are we really made of sugar and spice or snails and puppy dog tails? For many years scientists have debated whether gender is more genetics and biology (“nature”) or social environment and upbringing (“nurture”), or is it a combination of the two? A real-life story1 from 1965 can help us understand more about the nature versus nurture debate. A young Canadian couple brought their two identical twin boys (Bruce and Brian) to the hospital for routine circumcisions when the boys were 8 months old. A surgical mistake was made during Bruce’s circumcision, and his penis was destroyed. At the time, a well-known sexologist from Johns Hopkins University, Dr. John Money, was promoting his ideas about gender identity. Money believed that gender could be changed through child rearing and was not contingent upon chromosomes, genitals, or even sex hormones (Money, 1975). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After meeting with Dr. Money and discussing their options, the Canadian couple decided to have their son, Bruce, undergo castration (removal of the testicles) and have surgery to transform his genitals into those of an anatomically correct female. Bruce became Brenda and was put on hormone treatment beginning in adolescence to maintain his feminine appearance. For many years, this Brenda/Bruce case stood as “proof” that children were psychosexually “neutral” at birth and that gender could be assigned, no matter what the genetics or biology indicated. As a result, many children who were born with ambiguous genitals or who had experienced genital trauma were advised to undergo gender reassignment. It is estimated that one in 2,000 births involves a baby with ambiguous genitals or reproductive structures that are both male and female in physiology (D. A. Lewis, 2000).2
However, even though Money paraded the Brenda/Bruce story as a success, and around the globe intersexed children began reassignments, no one paid much attention to the fact that Brenda was struggling with her gender identity. Once she reached puberty, despite her hormone treatments, her misery increased and Brenda became depressed and suicidal. She never felt that she was a girl, and she was relentlessly teased by peers. At 15 years old she stopped hormonal treatments and changed her name to David. Although David eventually married and adopted children, his struggles continued. He battled depression his entire life and felt “brainwashed” by physicians (Burkeman & Younge, 2005). In 2004, he took his own life.
This case illustrates the fact both nature and nurture are important in the development of gender. Evolutionary theory argues that there are many behaviors in men and women that have evolved in the survival of the species and that gender differences between men and women may be at least partially a result of heredity.
In this chapter we will explore the nature versus nurture debate as it relates to gender in hopes of finding answers to the questions “What is a man?” and “What is a woman?” We’ll start by reviewing prenatal development and sexual differentiation. We will also look at atypical sexual differentiation and chromosomal/hormonal disorders. Although these disorders are not exceedingly common, their existence and how scientists have dealt with them help us learn more about gender. Our biological exploration of gender will help set the foundation on which we can understand how complex gender really is. We will also explore gender roles, theories about gender, and socialization throughout the life cycle.