There are certain ways during an interview that a husband and wife show they care about each other. They will laugh or unconsciously sigh and gesture together. (This evening Barbara and John had spontaneously laughed together at Johns microwaving Daisy’s meat bones.) When I interview one, he or she will spontaneously talk at length about the other. And this will be because when I ask a question about one spouse’s feelings about work or children, the response will naturally reflect a bond with the other. Often the answers to the housework checklist (which includes questions such as who cleans the dishes, makes the beds) reflect the telltale “both. . . both. . . both. …” The interviews will describe different lives but reflect experience in common and genuine empathy for any experience that remains unshared. All of this was true of Barbara and John. Whatever problems they had, I felt, were in spite of the fact they loved each other very much.
I asked them if they wanted to talk about the problem in their marriage. They said they did; it might help. What was the problem? The problem was not their child. They were profoundly pleased with their exuberant, bright, winsome, curly-headed daughter and wanted another child just like her. For different reasons, both were unhappy in their present jobs, but neither lived for career, anyway. They never fretted or quarreled about money, and neither one spent much. (“Barbara will call from the store and ask me whether she should buy a blouse, and Г11 tell her, sure, but why are you asking me?”) Many of the usual causes of trouble didn’t bother the Livingstons.
They said the problem was partly that they lacked time together. Softhearted people, they opened their home to dozens of kin and friends in need. Barbaras father stayed with them for six months when Barbara was pregnant with Cary, gradually gaining weight and getting off the bottle. Shortly after that, they invited Barbaras mentally retarded cousin to live with them. On a regular basis two or three nights a week, they invite friends or out-oftown colleagues to dinner.
In addition to the continual rounds of hospitality, they heaped loving attention on Cary, and this, too, effectively prevented them from talking to each other. As Barbara explained: “We were in a bad habit for a while. One of us would lie down with Cary and then fall asleep. Whoever was awake would drag the other to bed half-dozing. Now were trying to get Cary to sleep earlier so we can have some time together. But it’s a slow process, and scary, because we got so far apart.”
They both recognized a pattern of avoidance. But what were they avoiding? Barbara said: “I fear that maybe there would be a clash. We still don’t know how to talk. I’ll say something critical. He’ll withdraw. We’re afraid that we won’t know what to say to each other, and we’ll have to face some things. I felt that he was holding things back from me. But he wasn’t. He’s just like that. And in my hurt, I developed a shell that just got thicker and thicker. I lost touch with what makes me happy. I just knew something was wrong.”
I asked John, “How much do you feel the problems you’ve had communicating and feeling close with Barbara are related to having two careers and a family?” He answered:
It probably all stems from that. The problem started with Cary being born. The sex part of our relationship diminished a lot after Cary was born, mostly on my part. It was nil for a long time. Maybe I was jealous of Cary, because for the six years Barbara and I were married before the baby, I was the most important person to her. Maybe I just depended on Barbara too much and then when she had to share herself with Cary, the problem started.
When Cary was four months old, Barbara went back to fulltime work at her old job, and Consuela came from eight-fifteen until six o’clock. At this point, John got some time with Cary but not under the relaxed condition he would have liked. And now the pressures on Barbara had slowly escalated as well. As John put it:
I don’t know if I resented it, but for several months while Barbara was working those long hours I would come home and spend most of the night with Cary, which was okay. But I resented Barbara not being there because I wanted a few minutes to myself [without having to care for the baby]. Then I felt that Cary was being cheated by her not being here. And I wanted Barbara to spend more time with me. I think I withdrew, then. I didn’t want to complain, to make her feel guilty about working long hours.
Sometimes when I get angry I don’t talk. And when I don’t talk, that makes her mad. It led to our not communicating.
The problem seemed to start with the psychological triangle that emerged at the birth of the baby. John had found in Barbara the one person who could communicate with him in a way that his mother and father never had, and now depended on her for that. When Cary was born, Barbara focused on the baby. John focused on Barbara, feeling excluded, hurt, and angry.
At the same time, according to his egalitarian ideology, John felt these weren’t the “right” feelings. He wanted to have as much paternal feelings toward Cary as Barbara had maternal ones. But perhaps because Barbara unconsciously crowded him out, perhaps because he didn’t know how to feel paternal, thats not how it worked out. The surface of his gender ideology told him “we are equally involved in parenting Cary.” But in reality, it didn’t feel that way. Given John’s belief that his wife’s career should be as important to her as his career was to him, John felt too guilty to complain to Barbara about her long hours. His feelings told him one thing. The feeling rules that stemmed from his egalitarian gender ideology told him another. In the face of this conflict, he withdrew.
Soon John began working extraordinarily long hours at his own job. As he explained:
The first year after Cary was born, I worked sixty, seventy hours a week. If I walked out [of the office] before seven o’clock, I’d get dirty looks. I really got involved in advertising for our products. The first year they said I was the greatest thing. Blah blah blah. Don’t let us down. Blah blah blah. I felt insecure; I wanted to please them. But I also felt this anger building inside me, like I could have been spending more time with Cary.
My bosses were jerks, workaholic lawyers. I wasn’t an attorney, and to them you were nothing if you weren’t an attorney. When the market for our plastics declined, they completely lost interest in me. Later, when I quit, they hired two people to replace me. ‘
Both my bosses had babies Cary’s age. Their wives had part-time interests. One was a potter. The other sold Mary Kay products. After seven o’clock each night, each wife would start telephoning. One guy was devastated for months because he had a girl instead of a boy. What a jerk!
Finally, John quit his job and was quickly hired by another company, where once again his work situation was difficult. He said: “There are three vice presidents. None of them trust me, because I’m not Japanese. I’m getting nasty telexes from my boss in Tokyo asking ‘Where’s this?5 and ‘Where’s that?’ Then my boss in Los Angeles is talking to the people who work under me about my Tokyo boss’s complaints.”
Feeling abandoned at home and criticized at work, John began to suffer from anxiety attacks. As he described:
The first attack I had was at work. I was on my way out of the office to go to lunch and all of a sudden I just got real dizzy and passed out. When I woke I was on the floor. I thought I’d had a heart attack. From then on, it happened just about every day, for almost a year. My hyperventilation starts when I wake up in the morning. It happens when I’m getting up, taking a shower, getting dressed. Sometimes I sit down for an hour before I can leave, because I’m hyperventilating. It hasn’t happened for a number of months. But like yesterday morning,
I just sat here for twenty minutes. I was on my way out the door, ready to go, but I felt the anxiety building up. I shake.
I can’t breathe. I feel dizzy. I just thought, ‘No, I can’t drive.’
Events conspired to place a complex of stresses on John: the birth of Cary, the withdrawal of Barbara, and the enormous pressures at work. For his anxiety, his doctor prescribed Xanax, but now John had gradually become dependent on the pills: “They do control my anxiety, but they’re downers. They make me lose sexual interest, and emotional interest in life. I used to take about two a day. I wanted to get off them; every time I’d call for a refill I’d hope they’d say no. I’m still taking them, but not nearly as often as before.”
Desperate for a nonchemical solution to his anxiety, John went to a biofeedback institute, where his instructor told him he was suffering from “male menopause.” But John was doubtful: “I don’t think that was it. I felt my anxiety had more to do with my home life and my work. I didn’t go back.”
Never in his life had he so needed someone to talk to and never had it seemed so hard. Barbara was trying her level best to take care of Cary and her job; beyond that she felt, too, trapped in the long silence between them.
In the eighteenth century, young parents like John and Barbara might have been faced with a bad crop of corn in their field, a fire in the barn, a child’s colic. And one might have suffered a “nervous disorder,” said to be caused by diet and damp weather. Each might have found it hard to communicate. Each might have felt alone. But they wouldn’t have dreamed of divorce.
As a late-twentieth-century couple, the Livingstons required of their marriage a higher standard of human happiness. A marriage without talk or sex is, by modern measures, a marriage that is “not working.” When a marriage is “not working” divorce arises as a possible solution. This question of divorce was haunting Barbara and John when they thought of seeing a counselor.
The counselor suggested that they ask the mentally retarded cousin to leave the house, that they put Cary to bed earlier, that John wean himself from the Xanax, and that they both give more time to their marriage. But where would the time come from? The first shift, or the second? John thought this:
I think Barbara should consider getting a part-time job, or— yes, quitting. I know she enjoys working. I don’t know if she wants to be home. Maybe I’m placing too much of a burden on her to ask her to quit. I’d be willing to stay home. It’s not necessary that she be here, just that one of us be here to spend more time with Cary. I think deep down Barbara would like not to have to work as much. But she won’t admit that. I guess we don’t know what she wants to do.
I asked him, “You’d be willing to quit your job?” He replied thoughtfully,
Yes, it seems less natural for me, but if Barbara decided she wanted to work full time, and if we could arrange it financially,
I’d quit my job and stay home with Cary, and if we have another child, stay home with both of them. It would take a little time to adjust, but I could do it. I think I would need to have some interest, some part-time work and make some financial contribution too, as little as it might be.
John said he wanted Barbara to quit because of Cary. But it was he, not Cary, who was feeling deprived.
I asked Barbara if she would be willing to quit her job to stay home with Cary. She looked vague. “I don’t know. I can’t feel my feelings.”
When she gave her reasons for working, she mentioned such things as “wanting to be able to spend twenty dollars for lunch with friends rather than three dollars for a sandwich at Bill’s.” The work itself, she went on to explain, was a little boring just now. Then, dissatisfied with her answer, she repeated, “I don’t know what I’m feeling.”
For Barbara the matter was complicated. To handle the demands of work and family, she had pursued a supermom strategy, but now she was stuck in it. Barbara and John’s family myth had been: Barbara can’t stop to talk to John because she’s a busy working mother. The counselor had begun to show them that Barbara’s perpetual motion had also become a way to avoid conflict with John. Now she didn’t dare stop.
This fear of conflict struck me during a certain episode that occurred in the kitchen one evening I was with them. John was preparing a delicious baked chicken from his own recipe. Barbara was sitting at the kitchen table, teaching Cary Spanish names for the parts of the body. (“Where are your manos? Where is your cabeza? Where are your ojos?”) Consuela spoke little English, and Barbara was trying to create some consistency. They had invited Ann, an acquaintance in town on business from Kansas, to dinner. Ann turned out to be a dog fancier (“rather have a dog than a child”) who was two weeks past the signing of her divorce. Daisy, meanwhile, had been banished to the cellar, where she was silently cutting teeth on Cary’s old dolls. Occasionally looking toward the cellar door, the guest held a polite smile while Cary tied a chair to the garbage can with a long rope. I was also a guest that evening, talking for the moment with Cary.
Barbara asked me if I’d read the book How to Be a Better Parent I said I hadn’t. In what little time she and John had available, she was eager that they learn how to be the best parents they could. In particular, she’d noticed that she was more often the disciplinarian, John more often the “softy,” and she wanted them to try to be more consistent with each other. One thing they already did well was parenting; feeling confident, perhaps, that they could build on that strength, she said to John: “You’ll want to read How to Be a Better Parent. It’s really good. We need to work on being more consistent.” John looked doubtful. She remarked about another parenting book, which he had liked. “It was okay,” John replied. She urged him a bit more to read Better Parent Feeling pressed at work, and perhaps accused of being not quite up to snuff in the one area of life he did feel good about, John turned on her. “Do they have lessons on how to be a bitch?” There was a long, painful silence. It was clear John was deeply sorry for what he’d said. “I didn’t mean that,” he said softly, “I really didn’t.” “There’s truth in sarcasm,” Barbara replied, hurt. They saw no way to undo the harm and, with the two visitors, the embarrassment. Almost against their will, the marital machine had punched out regrettable words that could not be taken back. Finally, the child improvised a new rope game with the guest, amused us all, and the rest of the dinner was fine.
The last I’d heard, the owner had moved Barbara’s beauty salon to Stockton, adding a two-hour commute to her workday. Yet, reporting this news, Barbara was curiously relaxed. “So, it will be a long drive,” she said. “There’ll be less time alone,” John told me philosophically, adding, “We’ll have to see what the counselor says.” They were still avoiding trouble.
Two months later, I called to say I could visit them, if they wanted, to talk about how they fit into the larger study. They invited me to dinner again. I said I’d bring dessert. John answered the door. “Nothings changed,” he said right away. “We had twelve for dinner two nights ago. And three friends of Barbaras from New York have been staying overnight.” One friend who was moving to San Jose placed an ad in the newspaper for an apartment, listing their home phone number, so the phone rang day and night. I asked if they didn’t feel imposed on. “No,” John said. “Were happy doing it.” Their openheartedness to others, their sociability, their love of commotion was continuing, as John thought it probably always would. “When Cary grows up, I hope she invites friends over.”
But, despite what John said, something had changed—their need to avoid being alone together. After dinner I told them my thoughts: more than other couples I’d seen, they were using a “supermom” and “superdad” strategy. Unlike other couples, they were actually increasing and not decreasing the outside demands on them. We explored the other strategies other couples used, the ideologies that led them to use them, and the feelings behind the ideologies. Where might they fit it?
They had not created more time for themselves, they felt, but they were beginning to fear it less. I noticed that the house looked more fixed up and settled in. For the first time, John mentioned the idea of a vacation without Cary. On an afterthought, Barbara had decided to keep the dog. Still for the most part the dog was in the yard or basement—set aside, like the marriage. But now they wanted to keep her and she was allowed to frolic excitedly in the kitchen with Cary for a while and urged to calm down before she was sent outside.
Barbara voiced the feeling that, as the grand arranger of the second shift and primary parent to Cary, sometimes she felt like Johns mother. Their counselors had assigned John the task of trying to feel and act more like Barbaras father. Before he died, Johns father had not put his hand on Johns shoulder, had not talked to John about things on his mind. Since Johns mother had been uncommunicative as well, there was little in Johns childhood he could draw on for this task. But he had a hopeful, exuberant manner as he described trying to feel and act fatherly toward Barbara. It was fun to try. And if Barbara wanted him to, he was pleased to try his very best. It was an ‘exercise” the counselors had given them, a little embarrassing. But already Barbara looked pleased.
Just before parting, Barbara said: “I cant believe how close we came to getting divorced, and how hard that would have been on Cary. I know a lot of couples like us do divorce.” The birth of the daughter they loved so much, Barbaras long hours at work, the tensions at Johns office, and the absence of a language for talking out trouble had led them to their crisis. Like many two-job couples I talked to, both partners had faced hard times as children, and had come to marriage with a need to heal old wounds. They lived far away from supportive relatives, and talked little about their marital troubles with friends. They had accepted the prevailing idea that if a couple lacked emotional or sexual communication, they didn’t have a marriage. Compared to the time of Barbaras grandmother, Barbara and John lived in an era in which the demands on marriage had enormously increased, expectations of it had risen, and support for it had drastically declined. The long-range solution for modern marriage lies, I believe, in reducing those demands and providing a rich variety of supports. In the meantime, I asked Barbara what advice she would pass on to young couples like herself and John. As one who had looked over the brink and returned, she said with feeling, “See a good counselor and work on it.”